Table of Content
- Introduction: Reframing the Relationship
- Case Study 1: The Kalinga Temples and Odissi Tradition
- Case Study 2: Hoysala Temples and Iconometric Knowledge Systems
- Case Study 3: Painted Scrolls and Community Performance
- Ritual Landscapes: Tangibility of the Intangible in Sacred Geographies
- The Museum Challenge: Static Displays and Living Cultures
- Conclusion: Towards a Holistic Conservation Paradigm
Reframing the Relationship
The conventional binary of tangible versus intangible heritage often oversimplifies the deeply interconnected nature of cultural expressions, particularly in a civilizational context such as India’s. Tangible heritage—monuments, sculptures, architecture, manuscripts, artefacts—is commonly documented, restored, and archived with physical conservation strategies. However, when detached from its intangible counterpart—rituals, performances, knowledge systems, and oral narratives—it risks becoming an inert object, devoid of the cultural consciousness that once sustained it.
In India, a civilization that boasts over five millennia of uninterrupted cultural memory, tangible heritage rarely stands in isolation. It is not just “built heritage” but a lived experience, intrinsically layered with metaphysical, symbolic, functional, and performative meaning. The UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage has propelled discourse around this interdependency globally. Yet, India has always lived this principle, though only recently begun to document and institutionalize it.
Theoretical Framework: Civilizational Aesthetics and the Concept of 'Prana'
Indian aesthetic philosophy offers the perfect conceptual lens through which to view this duality. In Nāṭyaśāstra and Śilpaśāstra, the idea of “Prana” (life force) is integral to the creation of artistic forms. A temple idol, for instance, is considered incomplete until it undergoes Prāṇa Pratiṣṭhā, the ritual infusing the idol with life through mantras and rites. This process demonstrates a conscious recognition that matter alone does not constitute meaning—it is the intangible invocation that activates the object.
From the standpoint of epistemology, Indian knowledge systems (Jñāna paramparā) perceive all forms—ritual, oral, performative, architectural—as part of an integrated cosmos where art and life are indistinguishable. This perspective demands that we not merely conserve a temple’s structure, but also its liturgical sequence, soundscape, olfactory atmosphere, and performative vocabulary.
Case Study 1: The Kalinga Temples and Odissi Tradition
Take the Jagannath Temple of Puri, Odisha, a monumental example of Kalinga architecture. The temple is not just a physical edifice of laterite and chlorite stone—it is a ritual ecosystem, a universe unto itself. The daily sevas (ritual services), preparation of the Mahaprasad, recitation of Vedas, playing of Mahari dance (now nearly extinct), and chants of the devadāsīs are the intangible heritage that makes the temple spiritually alive.
700 CE Mukhalingeswara Temples Group, Kalinga architecture, Mukhalingam, Andhra Pradesh.
Moreover, the Odissi dance form, which evolved in the precincts of these temples, is not a secular performance art but a sacred offering. The gestures of the dancer, her eye movements, and musical intonations are iconographic codifications of the very sculptural forms carved into the temple walls. This is sculpture in motion, where the dancer embodies the deity sculpted in stone, manifesting the continuum of tangible-intangible.
Case Study 2: Hoysala Temples and Iconometric Knowledge Systems
The exquisite temples of Belur, Halebidu, and Somanathapura, built by the Hoysalas, exemplify precision in iconometry and architectural grammar. However, the deeper intangible legacy lies in the Śilpa Shastras and the texts of vastu-vidya that informed every aspect of their design—from orientation to sculpture placement.
The sculptures do not merely depict mythology—they are frozen performative frames of dance forms like Bharatanatyam and Yakshagana. In fact, many temple walls served as mnemonic devices for itinerant performers and storytellers who used the images to narrate epics and ethical dilemmas to illiterate audiences. Thus, the temple was not a passive structure but an interactive, multisensory pedagogical space.
Keshava temple at Somanathapura, Mysore district
Case Study 3: Painted Scrolls and Community Performance
India’s Phad, Cheriyal, and Patachitra scrolls are physical artefacts, but their true cultural value is unlocked only through performance. The Bhopa priest-singer of Rajasthan carries the painted scroll (Phad) of Pabuji and unfolds it before a village audience while singing the entire epic from memory over two or three nights. The scroll is the stage, the text, and the divine medium all in one. Its intangible counterpart—the oral tradition—is the soul of this heritage.
Today, many museums display these scrolls behind glass cases, inadvertently deactivating their performative power. Without Bhopa's voice, the Phad becomes a corpse of heritage, severed from its living practice.
A Unique Cultural Visual: Santhal Tribal Pattachitra by Manoranjan Chitrakar
Ritual Landscapes: Tangibility of the Intangible in Sacred Geographies
India’s pilgrimage circuits like Kashi, Rameshwaram, Gangotri, Sabarimala, and the Char Dham Yatra exist as sacred landscapes where ritual and geography become one. The ghats of Varanasi, for instance, are not just steps by the Ganga; they are ritual arenas that host Ganga Aarti, recitation of Puranas, Hindustani music performances, and countless funerary rites.
Ganga, Neeldhara, Haridwar. Source: Shwetha Achar Ramakrisha
Each architectural element—the kund, the chakra, the mandapa—serves as a platform for intangible practices, reaffirming that the landscape is both symbolic and functional. Attempts to restore or “beautify” these spaces often miss the point when they do not involve the community stakeholders or ignore the sensory and temporal rhythms that have defined them for centuries.
Sati Kund: The Sati Kund, located at Kankhal in Haridwar, is traditionally believed to be the sacred fire altar (Yajna Kund) where Sati, the daughter of King Daksha Prajapati, immolated herself. According to ancient legend, Sati, Daksha’s youngest and most beloved daughter, chose to marry Lord Shiva, despite her father’s strong disapproval. Daksha, a devout follower of Lord Vishnu, regarded Shiva with disdain and saw him as an ideological rival. Though Sati was initially led to believe that her father had accepted her marriage to Shiva, she later discovered this was not the case.
In a gesture of contempt, Daksha organized a grand yajna (sacrificial ritual), to which he invited all major deities, sages, and relatives—deliberately excluding Lord Shiva. Deeply grieved by this insult to her husband and overwhelmed by sorrow, Sati chose to end her life by entering the sacred fire of the yajna. This act of self-sacrifice is believed to have occurred at the site now venerated as Sati Kund.
Daksha Mandir. Source: Shwetha Achar Ramakrishna
Sati Kund. Source: Shwetha Achar Ramakrishna
Sati Kund. Source: Shwetha Achar Ramakrishna
Sati was angered at her fathers’ irrational behavior and jumped in the ‘Havan Kund’ sacrificing her life. This gesture of Sati angered Shiva who took up her burning body on his shoulder and did the tandava – the cosmic dance of destruction. While he was dancing, pieces of Sati’s anatomy fell at various places. These were designated as ‘Shakti Peeth’. However, the name of the place apart from the site itself is picturesque and very appealing to tourists.
A visit to Haridwar necessitates a visit to the Sati Kund area to understand the intensity of relations the Hindu pantheon has within itself as well as the all powerful trinity of Bramha, Vishnu and Mahesh. The Sati Kund is located on the banks of the Ganga at Kankhal which finds mention in the great Indian epic, Mahabharata.
The Museum Challenge: Static Displays and Living Cultures
Traditional museology, inherited from colonial paradigms, focused largely on objects as isolated entities. As a result, India’s vast intangible practices were long underrepresented. However, the rise of experiential museology—as seen in initiatives like the Indian Music Experience Museum in Bengaluru, the Partition Museum in Amritsar, and craft museums with live demos—is attempting to bridge this chasm.
More institutions are adopting participatory curation, oral history documentation, immersive audio-visual displays, and even ritual re-enactments to capture the ephemeral. This shift also respects the custodians of intangible heritage—whether they be weavers, singers, puppeteers, or temple priests—not merely as informants but as living archivists.
Conclusion: Towards a Holistic Conservation Paradigm
The safeguarding of Indian art and heritage must operate on the recognition that tangible and intangible are not two distinct domains but two facets of the same cultural diamond. The idol without invocation, the manuscript without recitation, the temple without ritual—these are fractured inheritances.
Authentic conservation must therefore involve multidisciplinary teams—including art historians, ethnographers, ritual specialists, linguists, and local community elders. Documentation alone will not suffice; it must be complemented by revitalisation and transmission through education, community engagement, and public policy.
In the end, India’s cultural resilience lies not in how long a stone wall stands, but in how deeply its associated traditions continue to breathe, speak, and sing through generations.
References
- UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. [online] Available at: https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention [Accessed 10 Apr. 2025].
- Michell, G. (1995). Architecture and Art of Southern India: Vijayanagara and the Successor States. Cambridge University Press.
- Dehejia, V. (1997). Discourse in Early Buddhist Art: Visual Narratives of India. IIC/IGNCA.
- Ghosh, A. (1953). Ajanta Murals. Archaeological Survey of India.
- Vatsyayan, K. (1982). Traditions of Indian Folk Dance. Indian Book Company.
- Dalmia, Y. (2001). The Painted World of the Phad: Traditional Scroll Paintings of Rajasthan. Mapin Publishing.
- Jain, J. (2011). India’s Performing Arts and the Museum: Institutionalising Living Traditions. Marg, 63(3), pp. 26–41.
- Singh, U.K. (2018). Museums and Intangible Heritage: Reviving the Soul of the Artefact. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(7), pp. 685–702.
- Shankar, A. (2014). Living Traditions: The Intangible Cultural Heritage of India. Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts.
- Varma, S.P. (2010). Indian Iconography: A Visual Lexicon of Indian Symbols and Rituals. Aryan Books International.
